On August 11, 2020, Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak signed Senate Bill 4, which sets new safety standards for the hospitality industry, provides some protections for hospitality workers, and provides for immunity for businesses who comply with statutory requirements.
In passing the law, the Governor noted the importance of the travel and tourism industry to the state. Due to the pandemic, the hospitality industry lost over 130,000 jobs in April and May alone.
The law creates new safety requirements for the hospitality industry in Nevada. Public accommodation facilities, which include hotels, casinos, resorts, or any other facility offering rooms to the public for monetary compensation, must follow standards for cleaning and public health. Specifically, high-contact areas (which are broadly defined and include elevators, exercise equipment, tabletops, and all sections of a guest room) must be cleaned regularly. Additionally, facilities are banned from offering incentives to guests to decline daily housekeeping, which many hotels had done as part of an environmental initiative.
The law sets standards for hospitality worker protection, which the Governor promoted as “first-in-the-nation legislation.”
Hospitality employers must notify employees within 24 hours if someone they have come in close contact with (either a guest or another employee) has been diagnosed with COVID-19. Once an employee has been notified, they are required to undergo testing and are entitled to three days of paid time off to await testing and testing results. Testing must be provided at no cost to the employee and may be provided on-site at the hotel, or at another facility. If a testing delay causes this process to be more than three days, the employee may qualify for additional paid time off. Employees are also entitled to time off if they contract the coronavirus.
The law also includes a business immunity provision. If a plaintiff files a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit against a business as a result of exposure to COVID-19, a business will be immune from liability if they can show that they were in “substantial compliance with controlling health standards.” Under the law, a court will have the power to determine as a matter of law whether an entity was in substantial compliance, but the plaintiff has the burden of proof to show that the business was not in compliance. This will make it more difficult for plaintiffs to sue businesses in Nevada for exposure to COVID-19. While most businesses in the state are included in the immunity provisions, the bill notably excludes schools, hospitals, and nursing homes, and hospice care facilities.
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014