On January 1, 2022, as a result of Assembly Bill 1033, leave under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) will be expanded to provide employees with up to twelve weeks of job-protected leave to provide care to a parent-in-law with a serious medical condition. The CFRA previously only allowed for leave for an employee to care for a child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner who has a serious health condition.
AB 1033 also makes changes to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing’s (DFEH’s) small employer family leave mediation pilot program. The pilot program applies to employers who have between 5 and 19 employees. Under the program, either the employer or employee may request that all parties participate in mediation through the DFEH’s dispute resolution division. To make eligible employees aware of this opportunity, AB 1033 requires DFEH to notify the employee in writing of the requirement to mediate prior to filing a civil action, and requires employees to contact DFEH’s dispute resolution division prior to filing a civil action. The bill also sets specific dates for when parties must request mediation and when mediation must be initiated. AB 1033 tolls the statute of limitations applicable to an employee’s civil action from the date the employee contacts DFEH’s dispute resolution division until the mediation is either complete or deemed unsuccessful.
Lastly, the bill entitles any small employer who is a defendant in a civil action that did not receive the required notification as a result of the employee’s failure to contact the department’s alternative dispute resolution prior to filing a civil action, to a stay of any pending civil action or arbitration until the mediation is complete or deemed unsuccessful.
Employers should note that AB 1033 was part of broader movement by the Assembly to enhance CFRA benefits. This included Assembly Bill 1041, which was written to expand family care and medical leave to address the belief that, in the author’s opinion, the majority of households today include close loved ones who are not biologically or legally related. Specifically, AB 1041 included leave to care for a “designated person,” which is “a person identified by the employee at the time the employee requests family care and medical leave.” The bill did not require the designated person to have any particular type of relationship with the employee, but did authorize an employer to limit an employee to a single designated person per 12-month period for family care and medical leave. AB 1041 was not passed, perhaps because legislators were persuaded by the arguments of opponents who argued that CFRA leave was just expanded this year and that the bill imposed a significant burden on small employers. Regardless, both AB 1033 and AB 1041 are part of a clear legislative trend of expanding leave and other employment benefits each year. California employers should continue to keep an eye on such efforts to avoid exposure to legal claims in the future.
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- “Prejudice” No Longer an Element to Determine Waiver of Right to Compel Arbitration | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Minimum Wage Increases for 2025 | By: Kelly O. Scott
- New Law Prohibits Discrimination on the Basis of Possessing a Driver's License | By: Tanner Hosfield
- LA City Council Approves $30 Minimum Wage for Hotel and LAX Workers | By: Pooja Nair
- New Law Mandates That Employees Can No Longer Be Required to Use Vacation Before Receiving Paid Family Leave Benefits | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Employer Alert: New Whistleblower Poster Required | By: Joanne Warriner
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014