On September 17, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB-685, which creates new COVID-19 reporting requirements for employers, increases mandatory public disclosure of COVID-19 outbreaks, and expands the powers of Cal/OSHA to cite and shut down employers with worksite infections in a streamlined process.
The law requires all public and private employers that find out about workplace exposure to COVID-19 to provide written notification to employees and contractors who were on the premises at the same worksite during the infectious period within one business day of becoming aware of the potential exposure. Any union representative must also be notified of the outbreak. The written notice must include information regarding COVID-19 benefits under state and federal law, workers’ compensation rights, legally mandated and employer-provided sick leave options, as well as anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation protections (the law prohibits retaliation against a worker for disclosing a positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis or order to quarantine or isolate). The notice must also include information about the employer’s disinfection and safety plan that the employer will implement and complete per the guidelines of the federal Centers for Disease Control. The notice must be written in English and in the language understood by the majority of workers. These notices must be kept for at least three years. The notice requirements will expire on January 1, 2023.
Workplaces with a COVID-19 outbreak as defined by the State Department of Public Health (currently defined as three or more cases) must provide information to local public health agencies within 48 hours. The notice must include the names, number, occupation, and worksite of all persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, a positive COVID-19 diagnosis from a licensed health care provider, a COVID-19-related order to isolate provided by a public health official, or who have died due to COVID-19. In addition, the notice must provide the business address and North American Classification System (NAICS) code of the worksite where the qualifying individuals work. The notice provided to the local public health agency shall also include the same information that would be required in a Cal/OSHA Form 300 incident report regardless of whether the employer is required to maintain a Cal/OSHA Form 300 injury and illness log. After this initial report, the employer must continue to give notice to the local health department of any subsequent laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 at the worksite. Health facilities are excluded from this reporting requirement.
The law also requires the State Department of Public Health to make workplace industry information received from local public health departments available on its internet website to allow the public to track the number and frequency of COVID-19 outbreaks and the number of COVID-19 cases and outbreaks by industry reported by any workplace. Local public health departments and the Division of Occupational Safety and Health will provide a link to this page on their internet websites. No personally identifiable employee information will be made public or posted.
Business groups, including restaurant industry groups, criticized this aspect of the law and argued that it provides “no safety value because the data will be weeks old by the time it is posted, and the exposed employees will have already received notice.” Additionally, they noted that the public disclosure requirement would cause public shame for businesses that may be fully compliant with state and local requirements and which had no control of the infections among their staff.
Lastly, the law provides additional enforcement authority to Cal/OSHA to act when it believes that employees are exposed to COVID-19 in a way that creates an “imminent hazard.” If Cal/OSHA makes this determination, the agency is authorized to prohibit entry to a worksite, shut down worksite operations, and require the company to post an imminent hazard notice. In addition, the law reduces an employer’s rights to rebut a Cal/OSHA determination of a serious violation for COVID-19 circumstances. In particular, if the employer does not provide information in response to a division inquiry, the employer may be prohibited from introducing information at a later hearing. Further, the division does not need to notify an employer 15 days before issuing a serious violation if the violation is related to COVID-19. These provisions relating to Cal/OSHA COVID-19 enforcement will automatically expire on January 1, 2023.
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014