The California Legislature has sought in recent years to expand the rights of employees in nearly every facet of business in California. Employer restrictions on an employee’s ability to work in the same industry after employment ends have been no exception. As a result of the 2023 legislative term, two bills limiting post-employment restrictions on employees. In addition to Senate Bill 699, which voids noncompete agreements of out-of-state employee seeking work in California, Assembly Bill 1076 was signed into law.
AB 1076 amends Business Code Section 16600 and creates Business and Professions Code Section 16600.1 in an effort to codify a 15-year old California Supreme Court decision. Specifically, Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, eliminated the “narrow restraint” exception that was applied at the time to evaluate the validity of such agreements. AB 1076 clarifies that, as a result of the Edwards decision, noncompete agreements or noncompete clauses in employment agreements, no matter how narrowly tailored, are void in California, with limited exceptions pertaining to the sale of a person’s ownership interests.
Although not defined by statute, the amendment to 16000 states that the terms “noncompete agreements” and “noncompete clauses in employment agreements” are to be interpreted “broadly” in accordance with the Edwards decision. Of particular importance to employers is the Edwards’ decision’s application to non-solicitation agreements and clauses, which have been more prevalent in recent years. Specifically, the court in Edwards distinguished between generally prohibiting the solicitation of an employer’s customers or clients (which is impermissible) and prohibiting the solicitation of an employer’s customers or clients by using confidential information or trade secrets (which is permissible).
In addition, under the newly created Business and Professions Code Section 16600.1, employers must notify in writing current and former employees who were employed after January 1, 2022, that any noncompete clauses or noncompete agreements previously signed by the employees are void. Each written notice must be individualized to the employee or former employee and delivered to the person’s last known address and email address. The deadline for sending this notice is February 14, 2024. A violation of 16000.1 constitutes an act of unfair competition, which can give rise to actions for injunctive relief and restitution damages.
While it is likely that the limits of AB 1076 will be tested in the coming years, employers may take a measure of solace that, for now, trade secrets and confidential information remain protected, but only if such a properly worded agreement to keep the information confidential exists between the employer and employee.
This publication is published by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. The publication is intended to present an overview of current legal trends; no article should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters. Articles may be reprinted with permission and acknowledgment. ECJ is a registered service mark of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. All rights reserved.
- Counsel
Jared W. Slater is a Counsel in ECJ's Litigation and Employment Departments.
Jared's practice focuses on defending labor and employment actions, including claims for wage and hour violations, harassment, and discrimination both ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014