On January 1, 2022, Senate Bill 62, the Garment Worker Protection Act, will become effective, making California the first state to ban piece rate pay for garment workers. SB 62 prohibits any “employee engaged in the performance of garment manufacturing” from being “paid by the piece or unit, or by the piece rate.” The law creates a compensatory damages penalty of $200 per employee against a garment manufacturer or contractor, payable to the employee, for each pay period in which each employee is paid by the piece rate. “Garment manufacturing” is defined to include sewing, cutting, making, processing, repairing, finishing, assembling, dyeing, altering a garment’s design, causing another person to alter a garment’s design, or affixing a label to a garment.
Importantly, SB 62 takes the unusual step of making retailers and fashion brands jointly and severally liable as “brand guarantors” with any garment manufacturer for the unpaid wages, reimbursement of expenses, interest, and any other compensation owed to manufacturing employees, along with the employee’s attorneys’ fees and costs, as well as civil penalties. Specifically, the law defines the “brand guarantor” as the company contracting for the performance of garment manufacturing, regardless of whether the person with whom they contract performs manufacturing operations or hires a contractor or subcontractor to perform manufacturing operations. Retailers who purchase from California-based garment manufacturers are thus subject to lawsuits for unpaid wages, penalties and attorneys’ fees sought by California-based manufacturing employees.
Garment workers can enforce their rights under the law simply by filing a claim with the Labor Commissioner. An employee may establish a presumption of liability with little evidence, such as a brand label “or other credible information”. Further, the law creates a rebuttable presumption that a garment manufacturer or brand guarantor is jointly and severally liable with the contractor for any amounts found owed to the employee. SB 62 also establishes an expedited basis for the Labor Commissioner hearing process, requiring that a decision or award be issued in 90 to 120 days from the date a claim is received.
The law also creates cumbersome new recordkeeping requirements, which extend to any entity in the chain of the garment manufacturing process, including brand guarantors. Starting January 1, 2022, garment manufacturers, contractors, and brand guarantors now are required to keep all contracts, invoices, purchase orders, work orders, style sheets, and any other documentation related to garment manufacturing performance for four years. In addition, garment manufacturers are required to keep employment and payroll records for the same four-year time period, increasing the existing three-year requirement.
In enacting SB 62 and outlawing piece rate work, the California Legislature purportedly sought to address subminimum wages as well as unsafe working conditions, stating that “garment workers are forced to constantly work as quickly as possible to complete as many items as possible in a workday.” However, the California Chamber of Commerce characterized SB 62 as a “job-killer” bill and urged Governor Newsom to veto it. In a statement lauding the law, Newsom’s office characterized the law as “nation-leading legislation that will end decades-old, unfair pay practices and require garment manufacturers to pay workers an hourly wage.”
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- “Prejudice” No Longer an Element to Determine Waiver of Right to Compel Arbitration | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Minimum Wage Increases for 2025 | By: Kelly O. Scott
- New Law Prohibits Discrimination on the Basis of Possessing a Driver's License | By: Tanner Hosfield
- LA City Council Approves $30 Minimum Wage for Hotel and LAX Workers | By: Pooja Nair
- New Law Mandates That Employees Can No Longer Be Required to Use Vacation Before Receiving Paid Family Leave Benefits | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Employer Alert: New Whistleblower Poster Required | By: Joanne Warriner
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014