To calculate the amount to be paid for employee leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, it is clear that employees who take advantage of FFCRA paid leave must be paid what they would ordinarily earn in a workweek. Their ordinary workweek earnings are based on their regular rate of pay, including the base rate for any overtime hours worked, but not any premium pay. An employee should only receive paid leave for the hours they are normally scheduled to work. Accordingly, an employer must first determine both the regular rate of pay and the appropriate work schedule in order to calculate the amount to pay an employee on FFCRA leave.
A regular, established work schedule can be used for workers whose work schedules do not change. For workers subject to a part-time or varied work schedule, a six-month average from the period prior to the date of the leave should be used. Where someone with a variable schedule has not yet worked six months, the hours agreed upon at the time of hire can be used. If there was no such agreement, then the hours for daily leave can be calculated based on the average hours worked per workday over the entire term of employment.
A six-month average is also used to calculate the average rate of pay prior to the date of the leave. For persons who have worked less than six months, the average will be based on the rate of pay for each week worked. Commissions, tips, or piece rates are included in the calculation by dividing the total sum earned by the total number of hours worked in each workweek. Employers can also compute this amount for each employee by adding all compensation that is part of the regular rate over the period and divide that sum by all hours worked in the same period.
As with other regular rate calculations made under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, amounts paid for expenses or for time not worked, such as holiday pay, gifts, vacation pay, show up or call-back pay, are not included. Note that the regular rate must not be less than any applicable state, federal or local minimum wage. Also, the pay does not need to include a premium for overtime hours under either the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act or the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act.
As emergency paid sick leave is subject to a limit of two weeks or 80 hours, employers should be aware that an employee’s regular schedule may result in an uneven payment of benefits over the two-week period of the leave. Thus, and for example, an employee who regularly works 50 hours a week may be paid based on that schedule for the first week, but would only have 30 hours left for pay in the second week. In addition, employers should keep in mind that emergency paid sick leave is paid at the regular rate subject to a $511 a day cap, or at 2/3 the regular rate subject to a $200 a day cap, and an aggregate cap of $5111 or $2000 total, depending on the reasons for the leave. (See earlier “What Employers Need To Know About The Families First Coronavirus Response Act” blog post for further details.) Emergency family leave is paid at 2/3 the regular rate subject to a $200 a day cap, and a $10,000 total, for another ten weeks. The qualifying reasons and caps are set forth on the FFCRA poster notice.
Finally, employers should understand that employees are permitted to substitute accrued vacation or other applicable paid sick leave during the period of leave under the FFCRA. Such employer or state provided benefits are not, however, in addition to FFCRA paid leave, meaning that employers do not have to pay both amounts for the same time period. Further, employees may not be forced to use vacation or other paid sick leave time during FFCRA leave.
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Kimberly Brooks, Esq.
This blog is presented under protest by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. It is essentially the random thoughts and opinions of someone who lives in the trenches of the war that often is employment law–he/she may well be a little shell-shocked. So if you are thinking “woohoo, I just landed some free legal advice that will fix all my problems!”, think again. This is commentary, people, a sketchy overview of some current legal issue with a dose of humor, but commentary nonetheless; as if Dennis Miller were a lawyer…and still mildly amusing. No legal advice here; you would have to pay real US currency for that (unless you are my mom, and even then there are limits). But feel free to contact us with your questions and comments—who knows, we might even answer you. And if you want to spread this stuff around, feel free to do so, but please keep it in its present form (‘cause you can’t mess with this kind of poetry). Big news: Copyright 2020. All rights reserved; yep, all of them.
If you have any questions about this article, contact the writer directly, assuming he or she was brave enough to attach their name to it. If you have any questions regarding this blog or your life in general, contact Kelly O. Scott, Esq., commander in chief of this blog and Head Honcho (official legal title) of ECJ’s Employment Law Department.
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- SB 1340 Allows Enforcement Of Local Employment Discrimination Laws | By: Kelly O. Scott
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014