On June 17, 2021, the California Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board (the Cal/OSHA Board) voted to approve a set of new modified COVID-19-related workplace emergency regulations, found here. The new modified regulations will need to be approved within ten days by the state Office of Administrative Law, which is expected to approve the rules. Governor Newsom has also indicated that he may approve the rules immediately.
These regulations replace more stringent regulations that were inconsistent with the latest guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the California Department of Public Health regarding physical distancing and mask wearing for fully vaccinated individuals.
Under the new regulations, for an employee to be considered fully vaccinated, the employer must have documentation showing the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single-dose COVID-19 vaccine. Employees may provide proof of vaccination or may self-attest. Employers must maintain a confidential record of the vaccination status of employees. Employers have the option of keeping a record of employees who presented proof, a record of employees who self-attest, or a copy of the actual vaccination card or health document showing vaccination status. Vaccines must be U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved, have an emergency use authorization from the FDA, or for individuals vaccinated outside the United States, they must be listed for emergency use by the World Health Organization (WHO). The prior regulations did not address vaccines administered outside the United States.
Physical Distancing
Physical distancing requirements have largely been removed from the COVID-19 emergency regulations. However, physical distancing rules separating workers by at least six feet will still apply around employees who are not fully vaccinated and who are not wearing a mask or an approved alternative, and who are not being tested at least weekly for COVID-19. Such testing must take place during paid time and without charge to the employee. Physical distancing rules will also apply when not fully vaccinated employees are eating or drinking and after outbreaks of more than 20 cases in an exposed group of employees. Employers are required to consider whether distancing measures are needed after an outbreak of three or more cases in an exposed group of employees.
Face Coverings
When indoors, workers who are not fully vaccinated will continue to be required to wear a face covering, unless they are alone in a room or vehicle. When outdoors, face coverings are recommended for those who are not fully vaccinated if six feet of distance cannot be maintained between people.
Unless wearing a face covering presents a safety hazard, employees may wear face coverings at work even if fully vaccinated, without fear of retaliation. The definition of a sufficient face covering includes only a surgical mask, medical procedure mask, a tightly woven fabric or non-woven material of at least two layers, or a respirator (N95 mask) worn voluntarily.
Employers do not have to provide employees with respirators (N95 masks), as required in the prior drafts of the new regulations. Instead, employers must provide respirators (N95 masks) only upon request by an unvaccinated employee, for voluntary use when working indoors or in vehicles with more than one occupant. Employers must also provide non-respirator face coverings for employees who are not fully vaccinated and ensure they are worn over the mouth and nose indoors and in vehicles, unless the unvaccinated employee is alone in a room or vehicle, or is eating or drinking (provided at least six feet of distance from other employees is maintained). Employers must also provide face coverings upon request, regardless of vaccination status.
Individuals wearing a respirator (N95 mask) under a Cal/OSHA-compliant respiratory protection program will be exempt from individuals identified under the definition of “close contact.” The regulations use the term “close contact” instead of “COVID-19 Exposure,” making the terminology more consistent with that used in the CDC guidance. “Close contact” means being within six feet of a COVID-19 case for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more in any 24-hour period, regardless of the use of face coverings.
COVID-19 Prevention Plan
Employers are still required to have a written COVID-19 prevention plan, which may be separate or a part of the employer’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program. The plan must now include information on how the vaccine is effective at preventing COVID-19 and protecting against both transmission and serious illness or death. Further, it is recommended that the plan be updated to reflect the various changes made by the new regulations. The plan should incorporate all applicable orders and guidance including the California Department of Public Health’s Interim Guidance for Ventilation, Filtration and Air Quality in Indoor Environments.
Additional Changes
- Employers will no longer need to offer COVID-19 testing during paid time, at no charge to the employee, to workplace close contacts if the potentially exposed employees were fully vaccinated and have no COVID-19 symptoms or to an employee who was previously infected within the prior 90 days and has remained free of symptoms for 90 days after the initial onset of symptoms, or for those who were infected but never developed symptoms, for 90 days after the first positive test.
- Notifications related to close contacts or outbreaks are still required to be given in writing, in a form readily understandable by employees. Written notice may include personal service, email or text message if it can be reasonably anticipated to be received within one business day by the employee. The notice must include the disinfection plan that the employer plans to implement and complete per CDC requirements. If the employer should reasonably know that an employee has not received the notice, or has limited literacy in the language used in the notice, the employer must provide verbal notice as soon as practicable in a language understandable to the employee.
- Following close contact or outbreaks, employers will be required to offer free COVID-19 testing to unvaccinated symptomatic workers during paid working time, even if there is no evidence that the exposure was work-related.
- Fully vaccinated workers without COVID-19 symptoms will not need to be tested or excluded from the workplace after a close contact.
- Special COVID-19 prevention measures that apply to employer-provided housing and transportation will no longer apply if all occupants are fully vaccinated.
Employers should note that failure to comply with the various requirements may expose an employer to a potential serious and willful claim, and citations from Cal/OSHA.
For additional information, employers may wish to consult Cal/OSHA’s Frequently Asked Questions found here.
UPDATE: Shortly after the vote by Cal/OSHA, Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order allowing the revised regulations to take immediate effect. The executive order avoids the usual 10-day delay associated with review and approval by the state Office of Administrative Law.
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Joanne Warriner.
This publication is published by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. The publication is intended to present an overview of current legal trends; no article should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters, but rather as general commentary on the subject discussed. Your questions and comments are always welcome. Articles may be reprinted with permission. Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. ECJ is a registered service mark of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. For information concerning this or other publications of the firm, or to advise us of an address change, please send your request to info@ecjlaw.com.
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014