On November 4, 2020, Uber, Lyft and Door Dash secured a victory in their expensive campaign to categorize app-based drivers as independent contractors. 55% of California voters voted in favor of Proposition 22, which means that app-based drivers will be considered independent contractors, and not eligible for employee benefits or protections.
The Lead-Up: California’s Independent Contractor Muddle
For the past few years, California businesses have reeled from a California court decision and new laws, which dramatically limit the use of independent contractors, reinforcing a strong presumption that every worker is an employee.
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court. This decision created a new legal standard, the “ABC Test”, for determining whether workers should be classified as employees or as independent contractors for purposes of California wage orders. In Dynamex, the Court overturned its previous test for independent contractors from a 1989 case, S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations.
Under the ABC Test, a worker may only be classified as an independent contractor if the hiring entity satisfies all three conditions of the test: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.
After the Court’s decision, the California Legislature tried to codify, clarify and expand Dynamex with Assembly Bill 5. AB 5 adopted the ABC test as a statutory presumption. By increasing the number of workers who would be categorized as employees, AB 5 effectively extended workers’ compensation, unemployment and disability insurance, paid family leave, and paid sick days to these persons.
A lengthy and confusing law, AB 5 provided exemptions to the ABC test for specific professions, including doctors, psychologists, lawyers, architects, engineers, accountants, insurance agents, realtors, hairstylists, freelance journalists and financial brokers. Additional exceptions were provided for others who qualified, including certain professional services, business-to-business relationships and app-based referral services. Independent contractors in these occupations would be governed by the more flexible Borello case that predates the Dynamex decision.
AB 5 took effect on January 1, 2020. Immediately after AB 5 went into effect, a flurry of some thirty new bills were proposed to expand or clarify the exceptions in AB 5. These bills were eventually consolidated to some extent into AB 2257. Effective on September 4, 2020, AB 2257 sought to improve AB 5 and expand exemptions to more professions on a limited basis. However, despite significant lobbying efforts, there were no provisions that would have permitted app-based delivery and driving services to be categorized as independent contractors.
Prop 22 and the Future of App-Based Delivery and Driving
Amidst the confusion of AB 5, Lyft, Uber and Doordash partnered to put Proposition 22 on the California ballot, essentially carving out their own exemption for app-based drivers. These companies spent more than $203 million campaigning for the Proposition, making it one of the most expensive propositions ever considered in California. Ultimately, 55% of California voters supported Proposition 22.
Proposition 22 requires companies with independent contractor drivers to provide specified alternative benefits, including: guaranteed minimum compensation at 120% of the applicable minimum wage; healthcare subsidies based on engaged driving time; mileage reimbursement; vehicle insurance; safety training; and sexual harassment policies. These independent contractor drivers are not otherwise eligible for employee benefits or compensation, such as workers’ compensation and overtime.
Now that Proposition 22 has passed, it will be very difficult for the state legislature to change it. California law requires a 7/8ths majority vote from both the California State Assembly and the California State Senate before it can be amended.
For the food and beverage industry, Proposition 22 will help keep the costs of third-party delivery stable. However, outside of the narrow exceptions provided by Proposition 22 and AB 2257, California employers of all types, including restaurants, food manufacturers and beverage companies, will need to be careful when hiring independent contractors and make sure that the ABC Test and the language of AB 2257 are carefully applied.
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- “Prejudice” No Longer an Element to Determine Waiver of Right to Compel Arbitration | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Minimum Wage Increases for 2025 | By: Kelly O. Scott
- New Law Prohibits Discrimination on the Basis of Possessing a Driver's License | By: Tanner Hosfield
- LA City Council Approves $30 Minimum Wage for Hotel and LAX Workers | By: Pooja Nair
- New Law Mandates That Employees Can No Longer Be Required to Use Vacation Before Receiving Paid Family Leave Benefits | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Employer Alert: New Whistleblower Poster Required | By: Joanne Warriner
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014