On April 7, 2023, the City of Los Angeles (the “City”) released a revised “LA Al Fresco Ordinance,” to govern outdoor dining. The City had previously released a February 2023 proposed ordinance that was met with intense opposition from restaurant owners and community members.
“LA Al Fresco” is a popular outdoor dining program that began in May 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to help restaurant owners use more space for outdoor dining without having to go through a prolonged approval process. Through the program, restaurants and bars could apply to expand dining areas into the street, sidewalk, and private lots adjacent to their location. Because the program was intended to be a temporary emergency program, the City Council and City Planning Commission suggested the need for a new, permanent ordinance to govern outdoor dining permits.
The original ordinance proposed in February 2023 was met with strong opposition from restaurants concerned that the cumbersome new requirements would make using the program unreasonably expensive. The February ordinance would have increased the price of applying for an “Al Fresco” permit from $0 to up to $20,000. It also included a cumbersome approval process. Restaurant owners referred to the February proposal as a “sucker punch” and the Los Angeles Times noted that the ordinance as written could “doom outdoor dining” in the City.
The revised April 2023 proposed ordinance keeps the cost of the program at $0 for businesses that already have an Al Fresco program. Restaurants that are newly applying for a permit will pay $400 to have their application processed. This is a fraction of the cost of the $4,000 to $20,000 in fees outlined in the original proposed ordinance.
The City’s fact sheet on the revised Al Fresco ordinance describes the program components as follows:
- Allows outdoor dining where restaurants are permitted without requiring Planning approval, so applicants can go straight to Building and Safety for permits;
- Removes zoning limitations that restrict the amount of square footage a restaurant could devote to seating patrons outdoors on private property, giving restaurants the greatest amount of flexibility in terms of serving capacity;
- Allows restaurant operators to repurpose any amount of parking spaces for outdoor dining, matching the current temporary approach to outdoor dining, removing physical limitations, and encouraging outdoor dining;
- Rescinds existing zoning rules that limit outdoor dining to the ground floor only, allowing outdoor dining in courtyards, patios, plazas, balconies, and other private property spaces to adapt outdoor dining to the variety of site configurations found throughout the City;
- Allows restaurants which meet the eligibility criteria to serve alcohol in outdoor dining areas through a streamlined administrative verification or clearance, in lieu of a costly and lengthy discretionary review process; and
- Establishes that the Al Fresco Ordinance permissions supersede conflicting provisions of any Specific Plan, Supplemental Use District or other overlay, to allow for consistent outdoor dining standards citywide.
The City also released a chart comparing the temporary program, the initial draft permanent program, and the revised draft permanent program.
The City is continuing to accept public feedback on the revised proposed ordinance. The revised ordinance will be presented to the City Planning Commission at an April 27, 2023 hearing, and would then be presented to the City Council for approval.
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014